Wrongful Death Claim Elements in Old Greenwich 06870 – Get the Best Advice in CT

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit in Old Greenwich 06870 – Common Mistakes in CT

Surgeons implant these retrievable devices in the veins of patients who are unable to take anticoagulants (blood thinners) in order to prevent blood clots from moving to the lungs. They catch the clots in the blood stream and, over time, the clots dissipate.

These are small, spider-like devices that are inserted into the inferior vena cava to intercept blood clots before they reach the lungs. The devices are an alternative for patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (condition in which one or more arteries in the lungs become blocked by a blood clot), and are often used when anticoagulants are ineffective or contraindicated. They contain a number of legs or “struts” that extend out inside the inferior vena cava.

Since August 2010, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has been raising concerns about complications associated with these devicer. Hundreds of reports have been filed with the agency involving incidents where parts of the device fractured or migrated to other parts of the body, particularly the heart and lungs.

The FDA updated safety communication in 2014, stating most devices should be removed between the 29th and 54th day after implantation. But the warning signs came too late for some. Plaintiffs began filing lawsuits across the country claiming the filters caused harm and death.

Although the filters were designed to prevent life-threatening pulmonary embolisms (PEs) – clots in the lungs –, they can have life-threatening side effects. In a report released in 2010, the FDA received more than 900 reports of adverse events associated with IVC filters.

A 2013 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examined the management and complications in 952 patients. About 680 patients received retrievable IVC filters, and doctors were only able to successfully remove 58 of them.

Doctors made 13 unsuccessful removal attempts, 11 of which occurred in those who had their filters for more than 85 days.

The best CT Cook IVC Filter Lawsuit you can find.

IVC Filter Class Action Lawsuit in Old Greenwich 06870 – Information For Buyers in CT

In state court litigation, some individual settlements have actually been reached in cases that were set to go to trial. Nevertheless, the manufacturers have not wanted to settle large numbers of cases. As an outcome, a growing number of complaints have actually been filed in courts throughout the United States over the previous year, and centralized pre-trial procedures have actually been developed.
Now that coordinated pretrial procedures are established for some suits, it is likely that a small group of suits will be gotten ready for “bellwether” trials to help gauge how juries might react to specific proof and statement that is likely to be repeated throughout the lawsuits.

Get Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit in Old Greenwich CT with a call.